| 
         OPEN LETTER  | 
    ||
| 
         to the foreign minister Fischer  | 
    ||
| 
         to
        the US-ambassador  | 
    ||
| 
         to
        the British ambassador  | 
    ||
| 
         to
        the Russian ambassador  | 
    ||
| 
         to
        the French ambassador  | 
    ||
| 
             
        Clean war?    | 
    ||
| 
         The US-strategy
        indicates mass murder    | 
    ||
| 
         subscription: 
        news of 03 March 2003  | 
    ||
| 
            | 
      
         US-strategy  | 
      
         criticism  | 
    
| 
         1.  | 
      
         The US-government wants to force Saddam Hussein
        to drop out within the first hours of his offensive.  | 
      
         We know from historical experience that a dictator can only be forced
        if he still has a way out left.  | 
    
| 
         2.  | 
      
         Above all the US-government wants to bomb the
        military and political headquarters of Saddam Hussein, air
        defence-systems, community centers as well as biological and chemical weapons of mass destruction.   | 
      
         Thousands of people will die in these targets, but probably the
        dictator would not be caught this way. On the other hand if the US-government would bomb biological and
        chemical weapons, the effect could come close to the direct use of such
        weapons.  | 
    
| 
         3.  | 
      
         The US-government wants to avoid
        civilian victims and damages to the infrastructure.  | 
      
         Who is being recruited in a dictatorship is not considered to be a „hero“,
        but must be protected like a civilian as long as not killing anybody.  | 
    
| 
         The Iraq-war would
        offend against the International law:  | 
    |
| 
         1.  | 
      
         Because
        the USA cannot refer to self-defence.  | 
    
| 
         2.  | 
      
         Because
        the USA is not entitled to take the law into its own hands and since
        solely the UN can resolve a military action.  | 
    
|   | 
        | 
    
| 
         3.  | 
      
         Since
        the mass murder of soldiers, who’s right of self-determination had
        been taken dictatorial would be against the Convention
        of Geneva.  | 
    
| 
            | 
      
            | 
    
| 
            | 
      
         The
        US-government at least has the duty to spare the human lives that are
        rooted in dictatorship,  And the devastuation would „only“ restrict to military facilities
        and government institutions. That would already be horrific,   to real avoid such a scenario, too. 
  | 
    
| 
            | 
      
         In Gulf-war 1990/91 we were shown
        pictures of military targets precisely struck by bombs, but in fact
        365,000 Iraqi’s were killed.    | 
    
secretary sabrina n.