OPEN LETTER |
||
to the foreign minister Fischer |
||
to
the US-ambassador |
||
to
the British ambassador |
||
to
the Russian ambassador |
||
to
the French ambassador |
||
Clean war? |
||
The US-strategy
indicates mass murder |
||
subscription:
news of 03 March 2003 |
||
|
US-strategy |
criticism |
1. |
The US-government wants to force Saddam Hussein
to drop out within the first hours of his offensive. |
We know from historical experience that a dictator can only be forced
if he still has a way out left. |
2. |
Above all the US-government wants to bomb the
military and political headquarters of Saddam Hussein, air
defence-systems, community centers as well as biological and chemical weapons of mass destruction. |
Thousands of people will die in these targets, but probably the
dictator would not be caught this way. On the other hand if the US-government would bomb biological and
chemical weapons, the effect could come close to the direct use of such
weapons. |
3. |
The US-government wants to avoid
civilian victims and damages to the infrastructure. |
Who is being recruited in a dictatorship is not considered to be a „hero“,
but must be protected like a civilian as long as not killing anybody. |
The Iraq-war would
offend against the International law: |
|
1. |
Because
the USA cannot refer to self-defence. |
2. |
Because
the USA is not entitled to take the law into its own hands and since
solely the UN can resolve a military action. |
|
|
3. |
Since
the mass murder of soldiers, who’s right of self-determination had
been taken dictatorial would be against the Convention
of Geneva. |
|
|
|
The
US-government at least has the duty to spare the human lives that are
rooted in dictatorship, And the devastuation would „only“ restrict to military facilities
and government institutions. That would already be horrific, to real avoid such a scenario, too.
|
|
In Gulf-war 1990/91 we were shown
pictures of military targets precisely struck by bombs, but in fact
365,000 Iraqi’s were killed. |
secretary sabrina n.